Ubuntu vs. XP: performance

Post freely any questions you have about fit-PC2
Post Reply
edmidor
Posts: 17
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 6:24 pm

Ubuntu vs. XP: performance

Post by edmidor »

I remember a thread on fit-pc.com forum where someone confirmed that XP on fit-pc works much faster then Ubuntu. Is it still the case for fir-PC2? If so, what's the reason for that? Is it only right for GUI, or it's about overall performance?

irads

Re: Ubuntu vs. XP: performance

Post by irads »

XP is still more responsive than Ubuntu. There is a very significant improvement in both compared to fit-PC 1.x

edmidor
Posts: 17
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 6:24 pm

Re: Ubuntu vs. XP: performance

Post by edmidor »

Is it GUI-related phenomenon, or any "server" app will be slower on Ubuntu?

irads

Re: Ubuntu vs. XP: performance

Post by irads »

It has to do with Gnome being heavy. Probably XFCE would be more responsive.
Server applications should work very well.

Post Reply

Return to “General fit-PC2 questions”