|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 3 posts ] |
|
| Author |
Message |
|
Arwen
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2011 10:43 pm
Posts: 144
Location: Middle Earth
|
 eSATA verses eSATAp For later models of the fit-PC3, could you consider making 2 USB 2.0 ports on the back a combo with eSATAp? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ESATAp
_________________
Arwen Evenstar
Rivendale, Middle Earth
|
| Wed Aug 22, 2012 5:03 pm |
|
|
|
gabrielh
Site Admin
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:13 pm
Posts: 1260
|
Re: eSATA verses eSATAp That will be a little bit complicated to replace the two back USB ports, but this is a great idea to implement as a face module
_________________
Gabriel Heifets
Fit-PC2/3/IntensePC support.
|
| Thu Aug 23, 2012 11:32 am |
|
|
|
Arwen
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2011 10:43 pm
Posts: 144
Location: Middle Earth
|
Re: eSATA verses eSATAp Putting the eSATAp on the FACE module should work the same,
since I recall it having access to 2 SATA ports on the internal
FACE connector.
_________________
Arwen Evenstar
Rivendale, Middle Earth
|
| Thu Aug 23, 2012 4:41 pm |
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 3 posts ] |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|